ObservedSeverity: LowerConfidence: High
Crash and feature-use analytics without advertising identifiers
The app sent crash reports and feature counts to Tallymark Analytics with a random per-install ID.
ClearScan PDF
Mobile app · Quietfile Software · com.example.clearscan
- App identifier
- com.example.clearscan
- Publisher
- Quietfile Software
- Platform
- iOS
- Versions
- App 2.4.0 · iOS 18.1
- Scan date and region
- Oct 2, 2026 · EU (Ireland lab)
- Consent state
- No consent prompt presented
- Scan method
- Lab device — authorized runtime traffic capture
- Coverage
- Substantial · methodology 0.9
Privacy exposure
18 / 100
Lower measured exposure
Summary of the tested session
During the tested session, the app contacted 3 recipient companies for analytics, hosting, and content delivery. No advertising or identity-resolution recipients were contacted in the tested session.
Evidence coverage: Substantial
Meets the minimum for rating. Some scenarios or contents were not assessable. Readable request contents: 100%.
Principal findings
ObservedSeverity: LowerConfidence: High
No advertising recipients contacted in the tested session
Over 40 minutes of use, no requests reached advertising, identity, or broker recipients.
What information was involved
A permission alone is not treated as evidence of collection or transmission.
| Category | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Advertising and device identifiers | No transmission observed in the tested session | No advertising ID in readable requests. |
| Network information | Observed in a transmission | IP address visible to contacted servers. |
| Approximate or precise location | No transmission observed in the tested session | No location values observed. |
| Browsing and interaction events | No transmission observed in the tested session | No interaction events observed. |
| App usage and viewing events | Observed in a transmission | Crash reports and feature-use counts. |
| Account or contact information | No transmission observed in the tested session | Not observed. |
| Sensitive contextual information | Not assessable with this method | Scanned documents stayed on-device in the test; cloud sync was not enabled. |
Behavior under tested privacy choices
| Scenario | Status | Recipients contacted | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| No consent prompt presented | Tested | 3 | Tallymark Analytics, Orbital Cloud, Nimbus Edge |
Why this rating
Illustrative · methodology 0.9
Sensitivity of observed information3/20
Persistence and linkability of identifiers5/20
Recipient roles and dissemination evidence4/20
Behavior under tested privacy choices3/20
Disclosure–observation discrepancies3/20
Five dimensions, 0 to 20 each, sum to the score. Coverage gaps never lower a score.
What remains unknown
- Optional cloud sync was not enabled during testing.
- Android version not tested.
What you can do
Review a recipient’s privacy information
Some recipients offer their own opt-out or deletion process.
Request another scan after changing a setting
A new scan can show whether the setting changed observed behavior.
Not a legal compliance certification or a safety guarantee. Child-audience assessment: Not assessed (separate from this rating). 3 recipient companies observed in this scan.